| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability because an exposed API endpoint exposes sensitive internal database information. This information could enable an attacker to facilitate targeted database attacks. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability in which the Content-Security-Policy (CSP) HTTP response header is not configured. CSP helps prevent attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) by restricting the sources from which scripts, styles, and other resources can be loaded. The absence of this header may reduce the effectiveness of browser-based security controls, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or negative security impacts under certain conditions. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject and store malicious scripts within the application that execute when a victim views the affected page, enabling session hijacking and the theft of sensitive data. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Communication vulnerability, which could allow an attacker with internal network access to intercept unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services, enabling the extraction of sensitive data and potential man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to analyze publicly accessible JavaScript files, enabling the discovery of hidden administrative API endpoints for further targeted exploitation. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Cookie Attribute Configuration vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to exploit missing security attributes such as SameSite, HttpOnly, Secure, and restrictive Paths, enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), session hijacking via Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and unauthorized access. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability because two exposed API endpoints return sensitive data. This information could enable an attacker to launch further, more serious attacks. |
| iControl is affected by an insecure Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policy vulnerability, which could allow a malicious website to execute cross-origin requests with included credentials, enabling an attacker to access and exfiltrate sensitive data within the context of the victim's active session. |
| HCL Digital Experience is affected by improper input sanitation. This can result in HTML injection which could be leveraged in content spoofing from a trusted domain. Apply HCL Digital Experience 9.5 CF238 or later to address this. |
| iControl is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to exploit missing authentication checks or insecure direct object references (IDOR), enabling privilege escalation and the unauthorized modification or deletion of sensitive application data. |
| iControl is affected by an Improper Error Handling vulnerability, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to trigger verbose database and system errors, enabling the disclosure of sensitive internal infrastructure details used to plan advanced targeted attacks. |
| iControl is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to intercept cookies transmitted over unencrypted HTTP connections, enabling the unauthorized extraction of sensitive information such as session identifiers. |
| iControl is affected by a Session Timeout vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to exploit an unattended or abandoned active session, enabling unauthorized access to the application and the ability to perform actions on behalf of the victim. |
| HCL Sametime is vulnerable to insufficient input sanitization. The application did not appropriately sanitize user input. When user input is implicitly or explicitly trusted without sufficient sanitization, malicious actors can leverage this vulnerability. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its search functionality, which could allow an attacker to force the application server to send requests to internal systems that are not accessible from the internet. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by SQL Injection flaw and a Cross-Tenant Data Exposure flaw vulnerabilities. which could allow an authenticated attacker to inject database commands to extract sensitive system details, as well as manipulate request values to gain unauthorized access to full personal profile data and PII across different organizations. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a high-severity Broken Access Control vulnerability, which could allow a low-privileged user to gain unauthorized access to administrative screens and functions reserved for higher-privileged roles. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject unsanitized malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser, enabling session hijacking, account takeover, and unauthorized actions on behalf of affected users. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Security Misconfiguration vulnerability, which could allow an authenticated attacker to exploit improper access controls, enabling the unauthorized viewing of restricted data elements across tenant boundaries. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Unrestricted File Upload vulnerability due to improper file validation controls, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute malicious payloads, resulting in a complete server compromise. |
