Export limit exceeded: 401132 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (102046 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-103625 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-10-02 8.8 High
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-104478 1 Formwork Project 1 Formwork 2026-10-02 7.1 High
Formwork before 2.3.13 contains a path traversal vulnerability in BackupController that allows authenticated panel users to read or delete arbitrary files. Attackers with backup download or delete permission can supply a base64-encoded backslash-separated traversal payload that bypasses PHP basename on Linux to access files outside the backup directory.
CVE-2026-51916 1 Transformeroptimus 1 Superagi 2026-10-02 7.5 High
TransformerOptimus SuperAGI v0.0.14 contains an incorrect access control vulnerability in delete_user_knowledge in superagi/controllers/knowledges.py. In affected source snapshots, POST /knowledges/delete/{knowledge_id} deletes the selected knowledge object without requiring authentication in the route and without verifying organization ownership of the supplied knowledge_id.
CVE-2026-103622 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-10-02 8.8 High
Use after free in SVG in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-103877 1 Apache 1 Directory Ldap Api 2026-10-02 8.1 High
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API. A rogue/compromised LDAP server (or pre-TLS MITM) can answer a client's loadSchema() subschema search with a schema object that contains a serialized Java class, allowing some potential RCE.  This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 2.1.0 before 2.1.9. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.9, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-103552 1 Apache 1 Directory Ldap Api 2026-10-02 7.3 High
Stack Overflow vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API. Before binding, a client can send a deeply nested search filter that overflows the stack in the server's decoder. This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 1.2.0 before 1.2.9. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.9, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-102731 1 Apache 1 Directory Ldap Api 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Memory allocation with excessive size value vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API. A malicious peer (or a MITM) can send a small BER-encoded response causing a large memory allocation before any data is received. This can lead to an OutOfMemoryError and denial of service. The client JVM OOMs (OutOfMemoryError bypasses the DecoderException handlers) or pins the large allocation per connection while the attacker stalls. A handful of connections exhausts any heap. The same bytes from an unauthenticated pre-bind client hit any embedding server that did not set MAX_PDU_SIZE_ATTR. This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 1.2.0 before 1.2.9. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.9, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-51907 2026-10-02 8.1 High
In TaskingAI v0.3.0 in the QR Code Generator plugin save_base64_image function, a path traversal vulnerability allows attackers to write image files to arbitrary locations on the server filesystem by manipulating the project_id parameter.
CVE-2026-104873 1 Langchain-ai 1 Langgraph 2026-10-02 8.1 High
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. From 0.1.45 until 0.4.4, the langgraph-sdk resource-scoped authorization decorators @auth.on.threads, @auth.on.assistants, and @auth.on.crons ignore the actions argument and register the selected handler for every action on the resource. Because that wildcard resource handler is selected before broader fallback handlers, an authenticated user may bypass fallback action, ownership, or permission checks and read, update, or delete another user's resource. Only Python deployments using actions on the affected decorators are vulnerable, and a deployment remains protected when the selected handler independently enforces all required checks for every action it receives. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.4.
CVE-2026-96940 1 Microsoft 7 Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019, Exchange Server Se and 4 more 2026-10-02 8.8 High
Weak authorization in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authenticated attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-90444 1 Cisagov 1 Malcolm 2026-10-02 8.8 High
A file-transfer interface that requires valid credentials accepts attacker-controlled filenames without restricting shell metacharacters. An automated process later constructs and runs a system command using the uploaded file's name, allowing an authenticated attacker to embed and execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of that process. This allows an attacker to read and modify ingested log data, and could provide a foothold for further movement within the internal network.
CVE-2026-39718 2026-10-02 8.8 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Webriti Wallstreet wallstreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wallstreet: from n/a through 2.8.6.
CVE-2026-104444 1 Yeswiki 1 Yeswiki 2026-10-02 7.1 High
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the comments API editComment route that allows authenticated low-privilege users to overwrite arbitrary pages or comments by supplying their own page as the pagetag field. Attackers can send a POST request to the api/comments endpoint targeting a victim tag, bypassing per-page write ACLs to replace content and reparent existing pages or comments.
CVE-2026-100661 1 Netty 1 Netty 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.17.Final contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the QPACK prefixed-integer decoder (QpackUtil.decodePrefixedInteger), which does not bound the number of continuation bytes it will process. A remote, unauthenticated peer can open a QPACK unidirectional stream (type 0x02 encoder or 0x03 decoder) and send a first byte with all prefix bits set (e.g. 0xFF for a 7-bit prefix or 0x3F for a 5-bit prefix) followed by an endless run of 0x80 continuation bytes. The decoder returns -1 ('need more bytes'), so callers never consume the input, the ByteToMessageDecoder cumulator grows without bound, and each decode() invocation re-scans the whole accumulated buffer, yielding O(N^2) CPU cost. The result is unbounded per-connection heap growth (OutOfMemoryError) and event-loop CPU starvation, reachable in every configuration. Fixed in 4.2.18.Final.
CVE-2020-37278 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Weaver e-Bridge contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access arbitrary files on the host system by supplying a file: URL to the downloadUrl parameter of the saveYZJFile endpoint. Attackers can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files such as /etc/passwd or configuration and credential files, and the same endpoint's support for http(s) URLs also enables server-side request forgery against internal network resources. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-10-17.
CVE-2026-46729 3 Apache, Apache Software Foundation, Redhat 3 Http Server, Apache Http Server, Hummingbird 2026-10-02 7.5 High
NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in Apache HTTP Servers mod_heartmonitor over unicast listener. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.68.
CVE-2020-8659 3 Debian, Envoyproxy, Redhat 4 Debian Linux, Envoy, Openshift Service Mesh and 1 more 2026-10-02 7.5 High
CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 may consume excessive amounts of memory when proxying HTTP/1.1 requests or responses with many small (i.e. 1 byte) chunks.
CVE-2020-8661 2 Envoyproxy, Redhat 3 Envoy, Openshift Service Mesh, Service Mesh 2026-10-02 7.5 High
CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 may consume excessive amounts of memory when responding internally to pipelined requests.
CVE-2026-47360 2 Apache, Redhat 2 Http Server, Hummingbird 2026-10-02 7.5 High
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server's mod_session_cookie module.   When SessionCookieRemove changes across internal redirects, the session cookie may still be passed to a backend server. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.68.
CVE-2026-98163 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-10-02 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount The commit 260fbcb92bbea ("cgroup: Move dying_tasks cleanup from cgroup_task_release() to cgroup_task_free()") extended the lifetime of tasks on the dying_tasks list. The iterators have provision to go through dying_tasks because of dying threadgroup leaders or explicit CSS_TASK_ITER_WITH_DEAD, however, it was expected that such tasks can obtain a new reference (that is possible before cgroup_task_release()/put_task_struct_rcu_user()). The tasks after cgroup_task_release() and before cgroup_task_free() are subject to race when they may or may not have ->usage count > 0. The race window is between css_task_iter_next() invocations when css_set_lock is released and we may arrive at a new ->task_pos. The iterator should not attempt to resurrect tasks whose ->usage count dropped to zero. (When that happens, __put_task_struct_rcu_cb() is already imminent and the returned task_struct would could be used after free.) As for the fix, we cannot simply check the signal->live count of a task on the dying list because that won't distinguish regular zombies waiting to be reaped from RCU remnant tasks that are going to be free'd. Therefore add an extra check to rule out ->usage==0 tasks from any iteration. The repeat: loop in css_task_iter_advance() doesn't consider ->usage count, so add a new loop to css_task_iter_next() to skip de-used tasks on the dying_list. Rough illustration of the possible race R (reader of cgroup.procs) T (thread) L (group leader) --------------------------------- -------------------------------- -------------------------------- L exits, signal->live > 0 cgroup_task_dead(L) css_set_skip_task_iters() // skips only cset->tasks list_add_tail(&L->cg_list, &cset->dying_tasks) css_task_iter_next() take css_set_lock css_task_iter_advance() leader && signal->live != 0 => it->task_pos = &L->cg_list release css_set_lock T exits --signal->live == 0 cgroup_task_dead(T) // css_set_lock release_task(T) cgroup_task_release(T) release_task(L) // zap_leader cgroup_task_release(L) put_task_struct_rcu_user(L) ...RCU... put_task_struct(L) L->usage = 0 /* L still on dying_tasks */ ...RCU... __put_task_struct(L) css_task_iter_next() // another iteration take css_set_lock it->task_pos = &L->cg_list get_task_struct(L) => addition on 0 drop css_set_lock cgroup_task_free(L) css_set_skip_task_iters() // dying skip comes too late free_task(L) cgroup_procs_show() task_pid_vnr(L)