Export limit exceeded: 402871 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 402871 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9799 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-25359 | 1 Sitzungsdienst | 1 Sd.net Rim | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67646 | 1 Telepedia | 1 Tableprogresstracking | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user on a wiki with the extension enabled, would trigger unintended authenticated actions through the victim's browser. Due to the lack of token validation, an attacker can delete or track progress against tables. This issue is patched in version 1.2.1 of the extension. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69634 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7202 | 1 Elgato | 3 Key Light, Light Strip, Ring Light | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Elgato's Key Lights and related light products allows an attacker to host a malicious webpage that remotely controlles the victim's lights. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7965 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The CBX Restaurant Booking WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-51144 | 1 Ampache | 1 Ampache | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13709 | 2 Linear, Wordpress | 2 Linear, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Linear plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'linear-debug'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's cache via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5185 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| The EmbedAI application is susceptible to security issues that enable Data Poisoning attacks. This weakness could result in the application becoming compromised, leading to unauthorized entries or data poisoning attacks, which are delivered by a CSRF vulnerability due to the absence of a secure session management implementation and weak CORS policies weakness. An attacker can direct a user to a malicious webpage that exploits a CSRF vulnerability within the EmbedAI application. By leveraging this CSRF vulnerability, the attacker can deceive the user into inadvertently uploading and integrating incorrect data into the application’s language model. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47914 | 2026-04-15 | 4.5 Medium | ||
| VaeMendis - CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2024-45504 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple Alps System Integration products and the OEM products allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the user and to perform unintended operations if the user views a malicious page while logged in. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43930 | 2 Eyecix, Wordpress | 2 Jobsearch, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eyecix JobSearch allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects JobSearch: from n/a through 2.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4344 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Shield Security – Smart Bot Blocking & Intrusion Prevention Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 19.1.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the exec function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable pin protection for the admin interface of the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5343 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rbs_ajax_create_article' and 'rbs_ajax_reset_views' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new posts and reset gallery view counts via a forged request granted they can trick a Contributor+ level user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42476 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the Authorization Code grant and Implicit grant both rely on the `state` parameter to prevent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks where a resource owner might have their session associated with protected resources belonging to an attacker. When this project is compiled with certain compiler flags set, it is possible that the `state` parameter will not be checked at all, creating a CSRF vulnerability. Version 0.11 checks the `state` parameter using a regular `if` statement or `doAssert` instead of relying on a plain `assert`. `doAssert` will achieve the desired behavior even if `-d:danger` or `--assertions:off` is set. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42475 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the `state` values generated by the `generateState` function do not have sufficient entropy. These can be successfully guessed by an attacker allowing them to perform a CSRF vs a user, associating the user's session with the attacker's protected resources. While `state` isn't exactly a cryptographic value, it should be generated in a cryptographically secure way. `generateState` should be using a CSPRNG. Version 0.11 modifies the `generateState` function to generate `state` values of at least 128 bits of entropy while using a CSPRNG. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4086 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The CM Tooltip Glossary – Powerful Glossary Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings or reset them via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4083 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Easy Restaurant Table Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4082 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39163 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| binux pyspider up to v0.3.10 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Flask endpoints. | ||||