Search Results (4746 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2017-8221 1 Wificam 2 Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\), Wireless Ip Camera \(p2p\) Firmware 2025-04-20 N/A
Wireless IP Camera (P2P) WIFICAM devices rely on a cleartext UDP tunnel protocol (aka the Cloud feature) for communication between an Android application and a camera device, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
CVE-2017-8769 1 Whatsapp 1 Whatsapp 2025-04-20 4.6 Medium
Facebook WhatsApp Messenger before 2.16.323 for Android uses the SD card for cleartext storage of files (Audio, Documents, Images, Video, and Voice Notes) associated with a chat, even after that chat is deleted. There may be users who expect file deletion to occur upon chat deletion, or who expect encryption (consistent with the application's use of an encrypted database to store chat text). NOTE: the vendor reportedly indicates that they do not "consider these to be security issues" because a user may legitimately want to preserve any file for use "in other apps like the Google Photos gallery" regardless of whether its associated chat is deleted
CVE-2017-8850 1 Oneplus 6 Oneplus 2, Oneplus 3, Oneplus 3t and 3 more 2025-04-20 N/A
An issue was discovered on OnePlus One, X, 2, 3, and 3T devices. Due to a lenient updater-script in the OnePlus OTA images, and the fact that both ROMs use the same OTA verification keys, attackers can install HydrogenOS over OxygenOS and vice versa, even on locked bootloaders, which allows for exploitation of vulnerabilities patched on one image but not on the other, in addition to expansion of the attack surface. This vulnerability can be exploited by Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attackers targeting the update process. This is possible because the update transaction does not occur over TLS (CVE-2016-10370). In addition, physical attackers can reboot the phone into recovery, and then use 'adb sideload' to push the OTA (on OnePlus 3/3T 'Secure Start-up' must be off).
CVE-2017-8851 1 Oneplus 3 Oneplus One, Oneplus X, Oxygenos 2025-04-20 N/A
An issue was discovered on OnePlus One and X devices. Due to a lenient updater-script on the OnePlus One and X OTA images, the fact that both products use the same OTA verification keys, and the fact that both products share the same 'ro.build.product' system property, attackers can install OTAs of one product over the other, even on locked bootloaders. That could theoretically allow for exploitation of vulnerabilities patched on one image but not on the other, in addition to expansion of the attack surface. Moreover, the vulnerability may result in having the device unusable until a Factory Reset is performed. This vulnerability can be exploited by Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attackers targeting the update process. This is possible because the update transaction does not occur over TLS (CVE-2016-10370). In addition, physical attackers can reboot the phone into recovery, and then use 'adb sideload' to push the OTA.
CVE-2017-9604 1 Kde 3 Kde, Kmail, Messagelib 2025-04-20 N/A
KDE kmail before 5.5.2 and messagelib before 5.5.2, as distributed in KDE Applications before 17.04.2, do not ensure that a plugin's sign/encrypt action occurs during use of the Send Later feature, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
CVE-2017-9632 1 Pdqinc 22 Laserjet, Laserjet Firmware, Laserwash 360 and 19 more 2025-04-20 N/A
A Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data issue was discovered in PDQ Manufacturing LaserWash G5 and G5 S Series all versions, LaserWash M5, all versions, LaserWash 360 and 360 Plus, all versions, LaserWash AutoXpress and AutoExpress Plus, all versions, LaserJet, all versions, ProTouch Tandem, all versions, ProTouch ICON, all versions, and ProTouch AutoGloss, all versions. The username and password are transmitted insecurely.
CVE-2023-34829 1 Tp-link 1 Tapo 2025-04-17 6.5 Medium
Incorrect access control in TP-Link Tapo before v3.1.315 allows attackers to access user credentials in plaintext.
CVE-2023-31300 1 Sesami 1 Cash Point \& Transport Optimizer 2025-04-17 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in Sesami Cash Point & Transport Optimizer (CPTO) version 6.3.8.6 (#718), allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via transmission of unencrypted, cleartext credentials during Password Reset feature.
CVE-2020-4497 1 Ibm 1 Spectrum Protect Plus 2025-04-17 6.8 Medium
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.12 discloses sensitive information due to unencrypted data being used in the communication flow between Spectrum Protect Plus vSnap and its agents. An attacker could obtain information using main in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 182106.
CVE-2020-14480 1 Rockwellautomation 1 Factorytalk View 2025-04-17 5.5 Medium
Due to usernames/passwords being stored in plaintext in Random Access Memory (RAM), a local, authenticated attacker could gain access to certain credentials, including Windows Logon credentials.
CVE-2024-40582 1 Pentaminds 1 Curovms 2025-04-17 7.5 High
Pentaminds CuroVMS v2.0.1 was discovered to contain exposed sensitive information.
CVE-2022-42454 1 Hcltechsw 1 Bigfix Insights For Vulnerability Remediation 2025-04-16 6.4 Medium
Insights for Vulnerability Remediation (IVR) is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks that may lead to information disclosure.  This requires privileged network access.
CVE-2022-21798 1 Ge 1 Cimplicity 2025-04-16 7.5 High
The affected product is vulnerable due to cleartext transmission of credentials seen in the CIMPLICITY network, which can be easily spoofed and used to log in to make operational changes to the system.
CVE-2020-25178 3 Rockwellautomation, Schneider-electric, Xylem 31 Aadvance Controller, Isagraf Free Runtime, Isagraf Runtime and 28 more 2025-04-16 7.5 High
ISaGRAF Workbench communicates with Rockwell Automation ISaGRAF Runtime Versions 4.x and 5.x using TCP/IP. This communication protocol provides various file system operations, as well as the uploading of applications. Data is transferred over this protocol unencrypted, which could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to upload, read, and delete files.
CVE-2022-0835 1 Aveva 1 System Platform 2025-04-16 8.1 High
AVEVA System Platform 2020 stores sensitive information in cleartext, which may allow access to an attacker or a low-privileged user.
CVE-2022-1524 1 Illumina 8 Iseq 100, Local Run Manager, Miniseq and 5 more 2025-04-16 7.4 High
LRM version 2.4 and lower does not implement TLS encryption. A malicious actor can MITM attack sensitive data in-transit, including credentials.
CVE-2022-2003 1 Automationdirect 18 D0-06aa, D0-06aa Firmware, D0-06ar and 15 more 2025-04-16 7.7 High
AutomationDirect DirectLOGIC is vulnerable to a specifically crafted serial message to the CPU serial port that will cause the PLC to respond with the PLC password in cleartext. This could allow an attacker to access and make unauthorized changes. This issue affects: AutomationDirect DirectLOGIC D0-06 series CPUs D0-06DD1 versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DD2 versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DR versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DA versions prior to 2.72; D0-06AR versions prior to 2.72; D0-06AA versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DD1-D versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DD2-D versions prior to 2.72; D0-06DR-D versions prior to 2.72;
CVE-2022-2485 1 Automationdirect 20 Sio-mb04ads, Sio-mb04ads Firmware, Sio-mb04das and 17 more 2025-04-16 9.6 Critical
Any attempt (good or bad) to log into AutomationDirect Stride Field I/O with a web browser may result in the device responding with its password in the communication packets.
CVE-2024-22084 2 Elspec, Elspec-ltd 3 G5 Digital Fault Recorder, G5dfr, G5dfr Firmware 2025-04-16 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in Elspec G5 digital fault recorder versions 1.1.4.15 and before. Cleartext passwords and hashes are exposed through log files.
CVE-2021-41835 1 Fresenius-kabi 7 Agilia Connect, Agilia Partner Maintenance Software, Link\+ Agilia and 4 more 2025-04-16 7.3 High
Fresenius Kabi Agilia Link + version 3.0 does not enforce transport layer encryption. Therefore, transmitted data may be sent in cleartext. Transport layer encryption is offered on Port TCP/443, but the affected service does not perform an automated redirect from the unencrypted service on Port TCP/80 to the encrypted service.