Export limit exceeded: 11370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11370 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1340 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Endpoint Manager Mobile | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A code injection in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile allowing attackers to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75429 | 1 Powerjob | 1 Powerjob | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| PowerJob versions 4.x through 5.1.2 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the /friend/process endpoint of the Server-Worker transport layer | ||||
| CVE-2026-58683 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-20 | 8.8 High |
| In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58710 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-20 | 8.8 High |
| In DecodeFilmGrainParams of film_grain_dec.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56974 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-20 | 8.8 High |
| In Start of AudioRtpPayloadEncoderNode.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66455 | 1 Internlm | 1 Lmdeploy | 2026-09-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. Starting in version 0.9.2 and prior to version 0.16.0, LMDeploy's PyTorch DistServe/PD-disaggregation control plane used `recv_pyobj()` to deserialize messages received through a ZeroMQ PULL socket. PyZMQ implements `recv_pyobj()` using Python pickle deserialization, which can execute arbitrary code while reconstructing an object. The peer address used by the receiver was supplied through the `POST /distserve/p2p_connect` HTTP endpoint. An attacker who could reach an affected DistServe API server could cause the server to connect to an attacker-controlled ZeroMQ endpoint and deserialize a crafted pickle payload. API-key authentication is not enabled unless the operator explicitly configures it. As a result, affected DistServe deployments without API keys allowed unauthenticated remote code execution with the privileges of the LMDeploy serving process. This issue affects the PyTorch backend when PD-disaggregation/DistServe is enabled. Ordinary deployments that do not use the affected disaggregated-serving path do not expose this data flow. The fix was released in LMDeploy 0.16.0. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should prevent untrusted clients from reaching `/distserve/*` endpoints, restrict the DistServe HTTP and ZeroMQ control planes to trusted cluster networks, configure API-key authentication, and block arbitrary outbound ZeroMQ connections from serving nodes. These measures reduce exposure but do not make pickle deserialization safe. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87909 | 2 Opajaap, Wordpress | 2 Wp Photo Album Plus, Wordpress | 2026-09-20 | 7.5 High |
| The WP Photo Album Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions via the wppa_image_magick function. This is due to insufficient sanitization of the multipart upload filename before concatenation into an ImageMagick command string executed via exec(), with only escapeshellcmd() applied to the whole command rather than quoting individual arguments. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to execute code on the server. escapeshellcmd() escapes shell metacharacters but does not prevent argument injection because spaces remain as argument separators, and the filename sanitization applied at the database layer is never applied to the physical temporary file path used for ImageMagick processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84434 | 2 Gravityforms, Wordpress | 2 Gravity Forms, Wordpress | 2026-09-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Gravity Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.0.4 via the upload_file function. This is due to a mismatch between the field validation pipeline and the file persistence pipeline, where hidden file upload fields bypass extension validation and a rejected file's intact upload state is later passed to upload_file() without re-validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. Exploitation requires the targeted form to contain a File Upload field with its Visibility set to 'Hidden'; the vulnerability is reachable by unauthenticated attackers on any publicly accessible form meeting this condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75031 | 1 Interchange | 1 Interchange | 2026-09-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the interchange/interchange project, a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability was found in the “quick question” admin feature. In default installations arbitrary Perl code can be injected and executed server-side by unauthenticated users. The Perl code normally runs within a Safe container which limits the scope of what it can do, unless the non-default AllowGlobal directive is configured for the catalog being accessed.CTOR] | ||||
| CVE-2026-93031 | 3 Deleeuw , Wordpress, Wp Cloud Plugins/ Deleeuw | 5 Share-one-drive | Onedrive & Sharepoint Plugin For Wordpress, Wp Cloud Plugins - Box (lets-box), Wp Cloud Plugins - Dropbox (out-of-the-box) and 2 more | 2026-09-19 | 8.8 High |
| The WP Cloud Plugins Use-your-Drive, Out-of-the-Box, Share-one-Drive, and Lets-Box plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions from 2.0 up to, and including, 3.8.3 via the download_file_to_uploads function. This is due to the import action being registered for unauthenticated users via wp_ajax_nopriv_, a missing capability check in can_import(), and the imported file's extension and contents not being validated against get_allowed_mime_types() before it is written to the uploads directory. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87935 | 2 Ichurakov, Wordpress | 2 Paid Downloads, Wordpress | 2026-09-19 | 8.1 High |
| The Paid Downloads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.15 via the admin_request_handler function. This is due to missing authorization and file type validation in the admin_request_handler function, which is reachable unauthenticated via is_admin() returning true for /wp-admin/admin-post.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. On Apache servers where AllowOverride is enabled, an .htaccess file placed in the upload directory may block direct HTTP retrieval of uploaded files, limiting exploitability to stacks that do not honor .htaccess directives such as nginx, LiteSpeed, and Apache with AllowOverride None. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87796 | 2 Sh1zen, Wordpress | 2 Multi Uploader For Gravity Forms, Wordpress | 2026-09-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Multi Uploader for Gravity Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.9 via the move_file function. This is due to insufficient file type validation during chunked upload handling. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62104 | 2 Superweby, Wordpress | 2 Migratico Lite, Wordpress | 2026-09-19 | 10 Critical |
| Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Migratico Lite <= 2.6.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92355 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to modify non built-in external feeds could exploit a path traversal flaw to overwrite arbitrary files on the server, which in some configurations could lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92627 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2026-09-18 | 7.8 High |
| A heap-use-after-free vulnerability exists in H5T__conv_f_f() in src/H5Tconv.c in HDF5 before 1.14.2. When converting a compound datatype containing floating-point members during a dataset read, a temporary buffer allocated with calloc() is freed and subsequently read from within the same conversion routine. An attacker who can supply a crafted HDF5 file containing a specially constructed compound datatype can trigger the use-after-free when the file is parsed by an application that reads the affected dataset, such as h5dump. This can result in a crash and, depending on heap layout and allocator behavior, may be exploitable for further memory corruption up to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59944 | 1 Getcomposer | 1 Composer | 2026-09-18 | 6.1 Medium |
| Composer is a dependency Manager for the PHP language. From 1.0 until 2.2.30 and from 2.3.0 until 2.10.3, a malicious or compromised dependency can bypass the earlier CVE-2026-59946 binary-path hardening because Composer validates literal parent-directory segments only during dependency resolution, while the symlink and installed-metadata paths described by the advisory skip that validation. A package can ship an in-package binary symlink that resolves outside its installation directory, or attacker-influenced vendor/composer/installed.json metadata can provide an escaping binary path during a reinstall or regeneration of missing vendor/bin entries. The installed-metadata path is reachable only when the vendor directory was not populated by the same validated install run, such as when it is restored from an untrusted cache, copied from an earlier build stage, carried over from an older Composer run, or writable by a lower-trust build step. Composer can follow the path, change the external target's permissions to make it world-readable and executable, and create a runnable vendor/bin proxy to that external file. The issue does not directly read or transmit data and does not by itself provide remote code execution. This issue is fixed in versions 2.2.30 and 2.10.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92937 | 1 Patriksimek | 1 Vm2 | 2026-09-18 | 10 Critical |
| vm2 3.11.6 is vulnerable to a sandbox escape leading to remote code execution in the host Node.js process. The fix for GHSA-m283-3h24-438v is incomplete: the bridge gate at lib/bridge.js:1624 identity-checks only the direct call target when deciding whether to rebuild/sanitise a rejected host Promise value. Registering the rejection handler through Function.prototype.call or .apply indirection (e.g., p.then.call(p, undefined, cb)) makes the intercepted target host Function.prototype.call, so the sanitiser never runs and the raw host error reaches sandbox code with its own properties intact. If an embedder exposes a host-realm Promise to the sandbox (an async host function bridged via the sandbox option, or a NodeVM external module's async method) and that Promise rejects with an Error carrying a non-primitive own property referencing a host object (for example err.detail = process), untrusted code in the sandbox obtains a fully functional proxy to that host object and can execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the host process (e.g., e.detail.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync(...)). The direct p.then(undefined, cb), bind, and Reflect.apply forms are correctly sanitised. Fixed in vm2 3.11.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89082 | 1 Hp Inc | 2 Hp Ac Print & Scan, Hp Output Central | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| HP has identified potential security vulnerabilities in the HP Advance software that may enable elevation of privilege, remote code execution, or arbitrary file write under certain conditions, impacting the HP Advance server hosting the software. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89083 | 1 Hp Inc | 2 Hp Ac Print & Scan, Hp Output Central | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| HP has identified potential security vulnerabilities in the HP Advance software that may enable elevation of privilege, remote code execution, or arbitrary file write under certain conditions, impacting the HP Advance server hosting the software. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89084 | 1 Hp Inc | 2 Hp Ac Print & Scan, Hp Output Central | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| HP has identified potential security vulnerabilities in the HP Advance software that may enable elevation of privilege, remote code execution, or arbitrary file write under certain conditions, impacting the HP Advance server hosting the software. | ||||