Export limit exceeded: 10790 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10494 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10847 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10847 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-1416 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access to functionality due to a missing capability check on several functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53946 | 1 Kuwfi | 1 Ac900 Router | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The KuWFi 4G LTE AC900 router 1.0.13 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on its web management interface. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trick an authenticated admin user into performing unauthorized actions, such as exploiting a command injection vulnerability in /goform/formMultiApnSetting. Successful exploitation can also lead to unauthorized configuration changes. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38344 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in WP Tweet Walls versions prior to 1.0.4. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38345 | 1 Solaplugins | 1 Sola Testimonials | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Sola Testimonials versions prior to 3.0.0. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47845 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lim Kai Yang Grab & Save.This issue affects Grab & Save: from n/a through 1.0.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51647 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chaser324 Featured Posts Scroll allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Featured Posts Scroll: from n/a through 1.25. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39163 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| binux pyspider up to v0.3.10 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Flask endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23736 | 3 Bitbucket, Confluence, Jira | 3 Snotify, Snotify, Snotify | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence allows attackers to manipulate a user's S/MIME certificate of PGP key via malicious link or email. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25234 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SmartHouse Webapp 6.5.33 contains multiple cross-site request forgery and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities by tricking logged-in users into visiting malicious websites or injecting malicious scripts into various application parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4082 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4083 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Easy Restaurant Table Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4086 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The CM Tooltip Glossary – Powerful Glossary Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings or reset them via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2483 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Surya2Developer Hostel Management Service 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /change-password.php of the component Password Change Handler. The manipulation of the argument oldpassword leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-256889 was assigned to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25238 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| V-SOL GPON/EPON OLT Platform 2.03 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to create admin users, enable SSH, or modify system settings by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a specially crafted page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41729 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP BEx Analyzer allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4218 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The AffiEasy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to plugin improperly releasing the tagged and patched version of the plugin - the vulnerable version is used as the core files, while the patched version was included in a 'trunk' folder. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform a variety of actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4312 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Soccer Engine – Soccer Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.12. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving match and team settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin settings as well as teams, players, etc. via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4314 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Hostel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when managing rooms. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create and delete rooms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2021-27701 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| SOCIFI Socifi Guest wifi as SAAS is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Socifi wifi portal. The application does not contain a CSRF token and request validation. An attacker can Add/Modify any random user data by sending a crafted CSRF request. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | ||||