Export limit exceeded: 401185 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (401185 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-103603 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-04 | N/A |
| Memory allocation with excessive size value in the HSS/LMS signature code (HssPublicKeyParameters, HssSignature) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who can supply both an HSS public key and a signature to cause a denial of service through memory exhaustion via a public key encoding with an excessive level count, because the level count L read when parsing an HSS public key was not checked against the RFC 8554 maximum of 8, and signature parsing then allocated an array of L - 1 entries before reading any further signature data. A single verification can commit up to about 17 GB of memory or fail with an OutOfMemoryException. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103604 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-04 | N/A |
| Inefficient algorithmic complexity in X.509 distinguished name string conversion (X509Name.ToString and IetfUtilities.ValueToString) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service through CPU exhaustion via a certificate, CRL, certification request or other structure whose name contains a long attribute value made up of characters that must be escaped, such as commas, or of leading or trailing spaces, because each escaping backslash was inserted into the buffer being scanned, so the work grew quadratically with the length of the value. Applications are exposed when they convert such a name to a string, for example to log or display it, or compare it with IetfUtilities.RdnAreEqual, as PKIX path validation does for directoryName name constraints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97663 | 2 Ivole, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Customer Reviews For Woocommerce, Customer Reviews For Woocommerce | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The Customer Reviews for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Author Name in all versions up to, and including, 5.122.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This requires the image attachment feature (ivole_attach_image) to be enabled, which allows unauthenticated attackers to both submit a review with an entity-encoded malicious author name and upload an attached image via the publicly accessible wp_ajax_nopriv_cr_upload_local_images_frontend endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96578 | 2 Creative-solutions-1, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Gspeech Tts Wordpress Text To Speech Plugin, Gspeech Tts | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The GSpeech TTS – WordPress Text To Speech Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content in all versions up to, and including, 3.22.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This mXSS-style transform bypasses WordPress comment kses sanitization because the payload is stored using only kses-allowed tags and attributes; the malicious event handlers and style fragments become active only when the plugin's output-buffer callback rewrites the rendered HTML at request time. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96567 | 2 Web-soudan, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Mw Wp Form, Mw Wp Form | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The MW WP Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'post_id' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The CSRF gate protecting form submission (MW_WP_Form_Csrf) is bypassable by any unauthenticated visitor who first loads the public form page to obtain a valid double-submit cookie, leaving no effective barrier to storing malicious payloads. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93880 | 2 Wordpress-extensions, Wpsoul | 2 Greenshift, Greenshift | 2026-10-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Greenshift – animation and page builder blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via '{{GET:}}' Dynamic Placeholder in all versions up to, and including, 13.2.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This requires a site administrator to have configured an element block's Custom JS field to include a {{GET:...}} placeholder and for that JS to contain the token 'import', which routes the substituted value to the unescaped raw echo branch inside a <script type="module"> tag. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97336 | 2 Jtsternberg, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Cmb2, Cmb2 | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The CMB2 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'file_list' Field Type in all versions up to, and including, 2.13.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This is only exploitable when an integrating plugin or theme registers a file_list field on a publicly accessible front-end form or a user meta box, as CMB2 is a developer library and does not expose these fields by default. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95817 | 2 Apasionados, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Dofollow Case By Case, Dofollow Case By Case | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The DoFollow Case by Case plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Comment moderation delays but does not prevent exploitation — once an administrator approves the visually innocuous comment, the stored payload executes in the browser of every subsequent visitor to the affected post. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102772 | 2 Jtsternberg, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Cmb2, Cmb2 | 2026-10-04 | 7.2 High |
| The CMB2 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the '<textarea_code field id> (e.g. kl_code, kl_post_code)' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.13.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The front-end save path requires only a CMB2 box nonce, which is emitted to all visitors including unauthenticated guests via a simple GET request, making the attack trivially reachable without any credentials on sites that expose a public CMB2 form writing a textarea_code field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95512 | 2 Freetype, Redhat | 6 Freetype, Build Of Openjdk 11 Els, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-10-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in FreeType, specifically within its CID font loader. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into opening content that embeds or references a specially crafted CID-keyed font. This crafted font can cause repeated allocations and decryptions of subroutine data across multiple font dictionaries, leading to excessive memory and CPU consumption. This can result in a denial of service (DoS) for the application or service processing the font, potentially causing it to hang or terminate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85492 | 2 Smub, Wordpress-extensions | 2 All In One Seo, All In One Seo | 2026-10-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via URL Pathname in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user visits a crafted URL. Exploitation requires the victim to hold the aioseo_manage_seo capability and to open the SEO Preview panel in the WordPress admin toolbar while visiting a page with a malicious payload embedded in the URL pathname. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97652 | 2 Veronalabs, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp Statistics, Wp Statistics | 2026-10-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WP Statistics – Simple, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via REQUEST_URI Query-Parameter Key in all versions up to, and including, 14.16.14 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94405 | 2 Shahjada, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Download Manager, Download Manager | 2026-10-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Shahjada Download Manager allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects Download Manager: from n/a through 3.3.71. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94180 | 2 Monetizemore, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Advanced Ads, Advanced Ads | 2026-10-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Monetizemore Advanced Ads allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects Advanced Ads: from n/a through 2.0.26. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104403 | 2 Thimpress, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Learnpress, Learnpress | 2026-10-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.4.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94651 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-04 | N/A |
| improper handling of exceptional conditions, Missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability in Apache Thrift java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96288 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-04 | N/A |
| Uncontrolled Recursion, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Erlang bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82458 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-04 | 7.5 High |
| Memory allocation with excessive size value, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Go, netstd, OCaml, Erlang, JavaME, Rust, C++, Java, Kotlin and D language bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85086 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-04 | 7.4 High |
| Improper certificate validation, Initialization of a resource with an insecure default vulnerability in Apache Thrift perl bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85088 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-04 | 7.4 High |
| Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift. Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check. RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name. Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure. This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. Users should upgrade to 0.25.0. | ||||