Export limit exceeded: 401189 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 401189 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (401189 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-94657 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift JavaME bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94656 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift ruby bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94636 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Improper handling of highly compressed data (data amplification), Function call with incorrectly specified arguments, Improper validation of specified quantity in input vulnerability in Apache Thrift py bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94541 | 2 Amauri, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wpmobile.app, Wpmobile.app | 2026-10-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| The WPMobile.App – Android and iOS App Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 11.82 This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to exfiltrate password-reset URLs for arbitrary users, including administrators, mirrored into the push queue by the mail-to-push feature, and use those URLs to take over the targeted accounts. This exploit chain requires the plugin's mail-to-push feature (wpmobile_auto_mail=1) to be enabled, as that setting is what causes outbound WordPress password-reset emails — including the reset URL and key — to be mirrored into the push row queue where they become accessible to the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91135 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ THeaderTransport. When an application enables the ZLIB transform for the frames it sends, THeaderTransport::transform() copies the compressed frame into the write buffer without making sure it fits. Data that does not compress, such as content a remote peer supplied, grows under compression, so the copy writes past the end of the heap buffer by an amount that grows with the size of the frame, and for large frames it also reads past the end of the transform buffer. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87117 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86536 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes ('prototype pollution') vulnerability in Apache Thrift all JS bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0 and re-generate JS code, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86535 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| Loop with unreachable exit condition ('infinite loop'), Improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes ('prototype pollution') vulnerability in Apache Thrift NodeJS bindings with TJSONProtocol. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85087 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Improper certificate validation, Return of wrong status code vulnerability in Apache Thrift python bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82459 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound), Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ 32 bit THeaderTransport. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80298 | 1 Havelsan Inc. | 1 Sef - Ai Chatbot Platform | 2026-10-02 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Sef - AI Chatbot Platform: before 2.1. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59671 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The endpoint “/es/datatables/getemployeetypesdatatable” is affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59670 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomListaValidacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/validationslists/assignList/Employee/45659”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59669 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “name” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/attachmenttypes/update/203336” | ||||
| CVE-2026-59664 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomServicioPrestado” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/providedservices/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59663 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomDelegacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/delegations/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59662 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomCompetidor” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/competitors/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18036 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-java | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation's division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17507 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-java | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation (org.bouncycastle.mls) holds RFC 9420's uint32 leaf_index in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the MLS interop test vectors round-trip the full range. GroupKeySet.SecretTree.hasLeaf and Group.validateRemove compared the decoded value directly against the tree's leaf count, and a signed comparison treats any negative int as less than a positive bound, so an out-of-range sender passed the membership check. In the hasLeaf case the SenderData of an unprotected PrivateMessage could then drive LeafIndex.directPath through NodeIndex.parent() arithmetic that never reaches the tree root, growing the resulting node list without bound until the JVM exhausted its heap. A single small message from any current group member could therefore deny service to every other member of the group. Both comparisons now interpret the value as unsigned via Integer.toUnsignedLong, rejecting an out-of-range sender however it was encoded; well-formed leaf indices are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16001 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Exposure of the message authentication key through the encryption keystream in the stream mode of IesEngine (an IesEngine constructed without a block cipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker who has observed one encrypted message with known plaintext to forge shorter messages of their choosing that the recipient accepts as authentic, via a crafted ciphertext and MAC tag, because the MAC key was taken from the key derivation output directly after a keystream as long as the message, while the derivation input depends only on the static key pair and fixed parameters. The keystream revealed by that one message therefore contains the MAC key for every sufficiently shorter message. | ||||