Export limit exceeded: 420515 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420515 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-116738 | 1 Kisli | 1 Vmime | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| VMime through 0.9.2 contains an integer underflow in the uuEncoder::decode function that allows remote attackers to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow via crafted uuencoded MIME parts. Attackers can send an email with a uuencoded line whose length character is 'b' but is not a 'begin' line, corrupting stack memory to crash the application or potentially execute code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116844 | 1 Fclairamb | 1 Ftpserverlib | 2026-10-28 | 4.8 Medium |
| Fclairamb ftpserverlib through 0.32.4 contains a cleartext transmission vulnerability because TransferOpen checks only the transferTLS flag set by PROT, not whether the prepared data connection uses TLS. When a client sends PROT P after PASV or PORT, file contents and directory listings cross the network unencrypted, even with mandatory encryption, letting on-path attackers read or modify them. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54404 | 1 Colinhacks | 1 Zod | 2026-10-28 | 7.5 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. The described memory use only grows in proportion to input already allocated by JSON.parse before Zod runs, is reachable only without an application request-size limit, and reflects expected validator behavior rather than a defect in Zod. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91289 | 1 Oracle | 1 Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Monitoring and Diagnostics SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools executes to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-91304 | 1 Oracle | 1 Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Installation Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools executes to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-111590 | 1 Goharbor | 1 Harbor | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| A wide range of Harbor versions allow SSRF via its webhook delivery component which does not properly validate web hook target addresses, allowing usage of private and link-local IP ranges. An authenticated attacker with ProjectAdmin permissions can configure a webhook policy pointing to a private internal address. When a project event fires, Harbor jobservice makes unauthenticated outbound HTTP POST requests to the target. If the target answers with an error status, the response body is written to the webhook execution log, which project members can read, potentially exposing cloud metadata or other network-restricted resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117560 | 1 Atxp | 1 Gemini-cli-extension | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| ATXP Gemini CLI extension through 1.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in runAtxp() that allows attackers to execute shell commands through unsanitized MCP tool parameters. Attackers can plant instructions in email or SMS content to inject $() or backtick substitutions into parameters like message_id, subject, or query, running commands as the user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117564 | 1 Buqiyuan | 1 Nest-admin | 2026-10-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| nest-admin before 1.0.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge administrator tokens by using a hardcoded JWT_SECRET committed in .env.production. Attackers can sign tokens with the known secret that JwtStrategy and RbacGuard trust, impersonating any user ID or claiming the admin role for full administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117568 | 1 Bitscorp-mcp | 1 Mcp-ffmpeg | 2026-10-28 | 7 High |
| mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run shell commands by supplying crafted videoPath or outputDir values to the resize-video, extract-audio and get-video-info tools. Attackers can embed $(), backticks or a closing double quote in an existing file or directory name to break out of the child_process.exec command string and execute commands as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94346 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Virtual Edition | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, contain a Path Traversal vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48360 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Connect Android Mobile App, Connect Desktop Application | 2026-10-28 | 9.6 Critical |
| Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86395 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Virtual Edition | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103313 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Bitpay Gateway For Woocommerce | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The BitPay Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 4.1.3 does not bind the payment provider's transaction confirmation to the order it completes, nor verify the confirmed amount, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who holds a single genuine low-value transaction to mark arbitrary higher-value orders as paid. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103330 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Sadad Qa Payment | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Sadad QA Payment WordPress plugin through 1.28 does not correctly verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, as the verification is keyed on a merchant secret that is empty by default and the rest of the signed data is attacker-controlled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a valid confirmation and mark orders as paid without payment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106648 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Royal Elementor Addons | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Royal Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 1.7.1070 does not validate submitted form field values before substituting them into the recipient addresses of its form notification emails, allowing unauthenticated attackers to replace the recipient list and relay attacker-composed email from the site's own domain when a recipient field is configured to echo a submitted value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115223 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Smart Popup By Supsystic | 2026-10-28 | 4.9 Medium |
| The Smart Popup by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 does not prevent template-injection payloads from being stored in a popup text block and later evaluated by its template engine, because the filter meant to strip template delimiters runs before a decoding step that reconstructs them, allowing an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary template expressions server-side and read PHP constants such as the site's database credentials and authentication keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6064 | 1 Gen Digital | 3 Avast Antivirus, Avg Internet Security, Norton Antivirus | 2026-10-28 | 7.3 High |
| Link following vulnerability in Data Shredder components in Norton Antivirus, Avast Antivirus, and AVG Internet Security prior to 26.5.10933 on Windows allows a local, low-privileged attacker to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. During a privileged shred operation, enabling arbitrary file/folder deletion that is leveraged to gain NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privelages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67074 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by a Remote Code Execution Vulnerability . It may allow attackers to execute code with the privileges of the affected application or service, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data exposure, or system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67073 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 8.6 High |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by an Unrestricted File Upload and Improper Access Control vulnerability. This could allow an attacker to upload malicious or unauthorized files and directly access or download sensitive uploaded content, potentially leading to information disclosure, unauthorized access, or system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67080 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability due to improper handling of errors or exceptional conditions. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive technical information, including stack traces, system details, or internal paths, potentially facilitating further attacks. | ||||